Research paper about documentar

Please write a 3 pages rough draft for the research paper. The rough draft should be at least 3 pages in length and it should contain signs of a clear direction – a thesis – and it should incorporate at least one reference (whether in quotation or paraphrase). Also provide a Works Cite page in MLA forma

My research question is: How do documentary films make the viewer question the truth?

When I was formulating this question, I realized that the majority of famous documentaries are about false convictions of innocent people that were wrongfully arrested by the police. The most famous documentary that I can think of in recent memory is the documentary Making a Murderer about Steven Avery. That is why I want to explore the way that the documentary director can get the viewers to question the truth through the film. I think that the most interesting aspect of a police/murder documentary is the way that it can actually lead to another conclusion that is separate from the one that occurred in actual history. In the actual case of Steven Avery, the police followed a certain perspective that led them to believe that he was the actual murderer. But through the documentary, the film goes through another perspective to put doubt on the way that the police handled the procedure. What is most interesting about this is that even though documentary films are based on true events, the film themselves are often about questioning the truth.

My research prospectus is:

My research question goes as the following: “What are the techniques used by the documentary filmmaker to question a narrative and how do these techniques provoke questioning the truth”. I believe that a major reoccurring theme among documentary films is their ability to give unseen perspectives about certain narratives. Many notable documentaries, such as Making a Murderer, shows how the police created a narrative to frame a certain individual as a murderer. The documentary film then investigates the case through the perspective of the victim to provoke the audience into questioning the truth. This is an important cultural and philosophical issue when it comes to filmmaking because it offers documentaries a unique position within the medium. Though other fictional and nonfictional films can inspire audiences, lead them to conclusions, and change their minds, it is only through documentary films that audiences can actually connect to a real-world narrative and question their reality. Therefore, this question is not only important to understanding the countless victims of false convictions, it is also important for the viewer to actually understand reality itself. By understanding the different ways that the filmmaker frames the truth, provokes thought, and edits reality, it gives the viewer a better understanding of their world around them.

For my primary literature, I will focus on wrongful conviction documentaries as they are the most notable case of how documentary films subvert narratives and provoke thought into people to find the truth. As discussed above, the documentary series Making a Murderer is a useful primary source to start. Other documentaries of the same genre include Amanda Knox, David and Me, and The Thin Blue Line that are all available on Netflix. I believe that these are very useful documentaries to study as they all share the same subject matter. They all involve the wrongful conviction of an innocent person in a broken and subjective justice system. As they involve the same story and conclusion, it will be easier to compare the different cinematic techniques that each of them uses to prove their point. By comparing and contrasting the different ways that each of these documentaries provoke the truth into their respective cases, it will be easier to understand how the documentary filmmaker uses certain techniques to provoke the truth.

To complement these primary sources, I will be using scholastic articles from the online library that directly tie in with these documentaries. For example, Bruzzi’s article, “Making a genre: the case of the contemporary true crime documentary” directly discusses the techniques used by the documentary filmmaker in Making a Murderer. I hope that by analyzing the way that documentary filmmakers poke into the blind spots of these narratives, I can help find a way of understanding reality much more objectively. By figuring out where these cases have failed to ascertain the truth properly, it will help make it easier for people in their own daily lives to see their own blind spots. By uncovering the case of wrongful convictions, then we can avoid these problems in our own lives.

Please write a 3 pages rough draft for the research paper. The rough draft should be at least 3 pages in length and it should contain signs of a clear direction – a thesis – and it should incorporate at least one reference (whether in quotation or paraphrase). Also provide a Works Cite page in MLA forma

My research question is: How do documentary films make the viewer question the truth?

When I was formulating this question, I realized that the majority of famous documentaries are about false convictions of innocent people that were wrongfully arrested by the police. The most famous documentary that I can think of in recent memory is the documentary Making a Murderer about Steven Avery. That is why I want to explore the way that the documentary director can get the viewers to question the truth through the film. I think that the most interesting aspect of a police/murder documentary is the way that it can actually lead to another conclusion that is separate from the one that occurred in actual history. In the actual case of Steven Avery, the police followed a certain perspective that led them to believe that he was the actual murderer. But through the documentary, the film goes through another perspective to put doubt on the way that the police handled the procedure. What is most interesting about this is that even though documentary films are based on true events, the film themselves are often about questioning the truth.

My research prospectus is:

My research question goes as the following: “What are the techniques used by the documentary filmmaker to question a narrative and how do these techniques provoke questioning the truth”. I believe that a major reoccurring theme among documentary films is their ability to give unseen perspectives about certain narratives. Many notable documentaries, such as Making a Murderer, shows how the police created a narrative to frame a certain individual as a murderer. The documentary film then investigates the case through the perspective of the victim to provoke the audience into questioning the truth. This is an important cultural and philosophical issue when it comes to filmmaking because it offers documentaries a unique position within the medium. Though other fictional and nonfictional films can inspire audiences, lead them to conclusions, and change their minds, it is only through documentary films that audiences can actually connect to a real-world narrative and question their reality. Therefore, this question is not only important to understanding the countless victims of false convictions, it is also important for the viewer to actually understand reality itself. By understanding the different ways that the filmmaker frames the truth, provokes thought, and edits reality, it gives the viewer a better understanding of their world around them.

For my primary literature, I will focus on wrongful conviction documentaries as they are the most notable case of how documentary films subvert narratives and provoke thought into people to find the truth. As discussed above, the documentary series Making a Murderer is a useful primary source to start. Other documentaries of the same genre include Amanda Knox, David and Me, and The Thin Blue Line that are all available on Netflix. I believe that these are very useful documentaries to study as they all share the same subject matter. They all involve the wrongful conviction of an innocent person in a broken and subjective justice system. As they involve the same story and conclusion, it will be easier to compare the different cinematic techniques that each of them uses to prove their point. By comparing and contrasting the different ways that each of these documentaries provoke the truth into their respective cases, it will be easier to understand how the documentary filmmaker uses certain techniques to provoke the truth.

To complement these primary sources, I will be using scholastic articles from the online library that directly tie in with these documentaries. For example, Bruzzi’s article, “Making a genre: the case of the contemporary true crime documentary” directly discusses the techniques used by the documentary filmmaker in Making a Murderer. I hope that by analyzing the way that documentary filmmakers poke into the blind spots of these narratives, I can help find a way of understanding reality much more objectively. By figuring out where these cases have failed to ascertain the truth properly, it will help make it easier for people in their own daily lives to see their own blind spots. By uncovering the case of wrongful convictions, then we can avoid these problems in our own lives.

 

 

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

At homeworkcheg.com, You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with at HomeworkCheg, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency