Assume you are a first responder to an incident involving a report of suspected misuse from an internal individual that occurred at your organization. You have been assigned to investigate this report. Using a digital forensics methodology, create a visual workflow diagram that shows what steps you would take in this investigation.
Here is the grading rubric:
MGMT 394 2.4 Hands-On Rubric
MGMT 394 2.4 Hands-On Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and Development
(Excellent – A) Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or clearly stated and well supported. Responses are excellent, timely, and address activity, including course concepts. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated.
(Above-Average – B) Content is accurate and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or stated. Responses are adequate and address assignment. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated
(Average – C) Content is not comprehensive and/or persuasive. Major points are addressed, but not well supported. Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
(Near-Failing – D) Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. Questions were not adequately answered or demonstrated.
(Failing – F) Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content. Few or no requirements of the activity are included in the response.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Structure
(Excellent – A) Structure of the activity is clear and easy to follow. Demonstrates excellent flow of thought. Activity is organized and structured in a manner that provides a clear representation of a finished product.
(Above-Average – B) Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. Finished product is presented.
(Average – C) Structure of activity is difficult to follow. Product is not finished or if present does not flow from the rest of the activity.
(Near-Failing – D) Organization and structure detract from the rest of the activity. Points are disjointed and lack in transition of thought.
(Failing – F) Structure is absent or not consistent. Organization is not apparent and inaccurate. Presentation and delivery are unacceptable.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
(Excellent – A) Analyses are organized in a logical manner, clearly presented, and titled properly. Activity is easy to understand by a lay reader and directly addresses the research questions.
(Above-Average – B) Analyses are sufficient in number, but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. Analyses are on topic, but may not perfectly reflect the research questions posed.
(Average – C) Insufficient analyses/reflection are included. Anayses/reflections do not adequately address the questions posed. Analyses/reflections are not well organized or clear.
(Near-Failing – D) Analyses/reflections are partially included, but are not clear or organized.
(Failing – F) Does not demonstrate ability to analyze assumptions and evaluate evidence, complexity of issues, and alternatives.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat
(Excellent – A) Activity demonstrates all designated guidelines in a clear and consise manner with proper formatting. Format enhances readability of work. Demonstrates excellent ability to use technology and tools effectively to enhance the finished product.
(Above-Average – B) Activity follows all guidelines and technology/tools are used to format the activity appropriately demonstrating a finished product.
(Average – C) Activity follows most guidelines. Formatting is not consistent and does not represent a finished product.
(Near-Failing – D) Activity lacks many elements of formatting.
(Failing – F) Activity is not formatted at all.
Total Points: 100.0
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.
At homeworkcheg.com, You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.Read more
The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.Read more
The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.Read more
By placing an order with at HomeworkCheg, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.Read more